8C.5.2 Nets

What are other ways to represent a 3d shape in two dimensions?  We saw last class that you can use one of several different views, but we can also take the shape and look at its "skin".  When you cut a polyhedron along some of its edges to lay it flat, we get a net:

Resources:

Fun Ideas with Nets and Networks

Pre-Class Assignment:

  • Before next class, read through the notes and copy them down into your notebook.
  • Think about the following 2 questions and add a comment to this article with your answer:
    • Do you think a net is more or less effective at representing a 3d shape two dimensionally than the 3 views?
    • Is there a way to figure out how many faces, vertices and edges a shape will have by looking at its net?  Use the examples of the triangular prism and the rectangular prism to help you.

In-Class Assignment:

  • P173 #3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, *12 *13
  • Koninsberg Network Problem
  • Circle Challenge peer editing
Comments (19)
1Thursday, 01 December 2011 16:06
Aleck Vaitkus
1.Less, for some people it's hard to fold it (mentally)
2.Yeah, but you'd have to know where the faces are
2Thursday, 01 December 2011 17:56
Mr.Yang
Aleck, maybe look at the examples of the triangular and rectangular prism to see if you can come up with a rule on the nets for determining how many edges it might have.
3Thursday, 01 December 2011 19:17
Megan Stewart
1. I think that it depends not he person, but for me the net makes more sense, because you can see how everything fits together.
2. I think that you if you know what the 3D object is, it makes it easier, but on the net, you can see all the lines and where they end so it is easy to figure out where multiple lines meet and they make a face, vertices or edge.
4Thursday, 01 December 2011 20:09
Emily Wong
1. Personally, I think a net is more effective, beause it's easier to piece together what the shape looks like. All of its faces are shown to you connected, rather than seeing 3 separate views. Though depending on the shape, it could get confusing..

2. By looking at a net, you can figure out the faces, vertices and edges because it's all laid out for you to see and all of the faces and lines of the edges are shown. So you could probably just count them.
5Friday, 02 December 2011 19:25
Tyler Lauinger
I find that it represents the 3d shape in 2d better than the isometric views.Because the sides are already conected it makes it easier to interpret.

Yes. It is quite easy to count and find the vertices, faces and edges. By looking at the net as the 3d shape can help you find the vertices, faces and edges.
6Saturday, 03 December 2011 12:21
Eric Bourhill
1. Drawing Net vs. 3 Views - I prefer the "Drawing Nets" because when I look at them, I immediately start to see how the the 3D shape can be formed. With 3 Views, you need some more experience to help you identify the 3D shape.

2. Figuring Out #s - For Faces - count each unique face in the net; For Vertices - count corners where edges meet not including flaps; For Edges - count edges through the core shape not including flaps or common edges. This is tricky sometimes!
7Sunday, 04 December 2011 11:27
ConorBirarda
1. personally i think net is more effective because it is easier to put the edges and vertices together mentally then trying to piece together the 3 different views, but i think that it is different for different people.

2. yes, u can mentally put together the edges of the net and count the faces, vertices, and edges, if you knew what the net was for example, a triangular prism, you could easily count the edges, faces, and vertices of the shape.
:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
8Sunday, 04 December 2011 14:16
Ian St. Laurent
I think net is more effective than 3d views because it is easy to mentally put the object together using the vertices and edges and seeing all the sides come together.
9Sunday, 04 December 2011 14:20
Ian St. Laurent
2. all the sides and edges are laid out but then you have to mentally put the object together then count the faces, vertices and edges.
10Sunday, 04 December 2011 14:50
Anna Sarafis
Question #1:
I think it is your preference when showing the 3D shape. You could either show it in 3 views or a net. It depends which type of way is easier to visually comprehend. For me, I find the net is easier to effectively represent because it is laid out in 1 piece. It has lines to show the parts of the shape and the lines are also representing where the pieces bend. So I name the sides and picture bending it in my head to form the shape. But if the object is more detail (e.g. animal) then I find 3 views better for representing the object.

Question #2:
If you know what the net makes up when looking at the net then it is easier to picture in your mind where the faces, vertices and edges are. The lines on the net helps determine the part of the shape and what piece it is; what the line connects.
11Sunday, 04 December 2011 17:18
Amanda Mckinnon
Question 1: I think a net is more effective at representing 3D objects that are more basic such as a prism, a pyramid, a cylinder, etc. but for a complicated multi-tiered object it is better to use 3 isometric views because it is easier for showing different depths. With nets it is impossible to show different heights within the object without making an extremley complicated net

Question 2: When looking at a net to find the number of faces you would count the number of squares or rectangles that make up the object. To find the number of edges and vertices you could count them by picturing the object menatally, drawing it as a glass object so you can see through it, or creating and looking at one made by folding scrap paper or an object of the same shape
12Sunday, 04 December 2011 18:08
Hannah Oldham
1. I think that a net is more effective because you can see the measurements clearly and it's much easier to piece the obect together. However, in some occasions three views would be easier because if an object is too complex, it would be hard to piece a net together.

2. Yes, there is a way to figure out how many faces, vertices, and edges a shape will have by looking at it's net. We could look for where edges meet in corners and where there are whole shapes in the net
13Sunday, 04 December 2011 19:39
Claire Gooding
Q1: I think it depends on what you're trying to do; if you want to determine the volume or measure the length, height and width then I think the three pictures are more effective but if you're trying to mentally picture what a shape looks like then I think a net would be much more effective.

Q2: You could count the vertices, faces, and edges by looking at the net or you could mentally put the shape together using the net and then count the faces, vertices and edges.
14Sunday, 04 December 2011 20:10
Elise Ewing
Q1- I think it depends on how you see it but to me the net is better because you dont have to figure out how everything fits together, you just connect all the unconnected sides as if it were being folded.

Q2- Yes, you can find all the vertices, faces and edges very easily by using a net because you can clearly see all of them in front of you so all you have to do is count them without worrying tht u have to look at the shape from another angle
15Sunday, 04 December 2011 21:24
Gillian Rosenthal
1) I think a net is more effective at representing a 3D shape then drawing a 3D shape 2 dimensionally because you can see how all the edges go together
2)Yes, you can figure out how many faces, verticies and edges a shape will have by looking at them in a net because it is all layed our infront of you so you can probably just count them.
16Monday, 05 December 2011 18:16
William Abraham
1. A net would be the best for very simple 3D objects such as a triangular prism, hexagonal prism etc. The views how ever lets you see the depth of a 3D object a lot more easily.

2. Yes. You just have to see which edges of the net will be pieced together.
17Monday, 05 December 2011 18:32
Michael Muszynski
1. I think that the net would be good for representing shapes without depth, such as a rectangular prism, cylinder,or triangular prism. Something that isn't complex. The 3 pictures would come in handy when there is more of an advanced shape like an animal.
2. Yes, you just need to mentally put it together in your head
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D
18Monday, 05 December 2011 22:42
Andrew Hughes
1.It depends on how complex the shape is. If it is not complex the net works better but if it is the three views is more accurate.

2.If you put it together mentally
19Tuesday, 06 December 2011 17:42
Bryn Davies

1.I think a net is more effective to represent basic shapes but is you are are makes a net for a very complicated shape it is basically useless. 

2. YEs a net makes it really easy to count all the facies and verticies.
   

Math 8C Calendar  

loader
   

Ma8C Important Dates